The misplacement of fascism and its followers on the right.
Last time I, so very eloquently explained the reasons for my party organizations away from the so-called "classic". This time, however, I will focus on acquired preconceptions and "genetic" in the area of \u200b\u200bso-called right. The first misconception is, no doubt, the location of the party MSI right. On 26 December, in the study by Arturo Michelini, MSI was founded. At first this movement was born as a means of ensuring a fascist political citizenship to the veterans, while also an ideal continuity with the values \u200b\u200bembodied in an exemplary epic of Salò.
Until 1948, the MSI had not married the right reasons. The obvious proof of this is to be found in the debate that followed after the placement (literally) in the far right of the parliament parliamentary MSI.
On that occasion he answered - ensuring the militant base - that the option was not "ideological" but only "tactics." This is because the men were sitting at the opposite end of Togliatti. This is the official story.
In fact, both the position taken by some States and for the influence of "power centers", the MSI was transformed, gradually, diabolically by dynamic force, and revolutionary antiplutocratica in a static force, curator at the service of anti-fascist democratic state!
In 1949, after a heated debate and bitter controversy, this "movement" changes in a short period of time by the anti-American standard-bearer of the Atlantic Alliance. The next step is completed in 1952. During the administrative lists hagfishes electoral success to get an agreement in Rome between MSI, monarchists and democrats. But let's get to the point. The first is to remove bias from anti-communism. Rauti Joseph was the first to establish clearly the difference between Bolshevism and Communism. In fact, on the magazine "ace of clubs" 2 -01-55 wrote, among other things:
"The generic anti-aspiration (...) is divided and is clearly different. There 's anticommunism of the "values" and there is the anti-interest. We are ready to react against subversion rampant, to create something new, and there are those who are willing only to defend what already exists. There is, in short, a bourgeois anti-communism and anti-revolutionary, what better to stand out, we would love to see more call with his real name antibolshevism ".
pity though, that after less than ten years, Rauti denied its entirety beliefs and began to serve those interests hides solid, rather than pursue the difficult path before undertaken.
The misconception is so widespread that even the leaders of these remain immune. Mirko Tremaglia In an interview with the magazine "AREA" says:
"Then Rauti was the antithesis of the Left: When did the Congress of the Eagle, in '53, on the one hand we were there, called the "pale faces" of those who were "left", and then there was Rauti who headed the "sons of the sun" that is the right "aristocratic" in the group ... "
Well, many things have changed 's then, right? ".
After reading this, one is tempted to ask why Tremaglia (true) for which you have not joined the PCI Togliatti.
Now, without considering the merits of this instrument and improvised statement I find it useful to clear up these unnecessary doubts, citing the teacher, Andrea Evola Julius Caesar.
Baron black, anti-serious, convinced, he wasted gallons of ink to explain to would-be comrades this exemplary truth
After reading this, one is tempted to ask why Tremaglia (true) for which you have not joined the PCI Togliatti.
Now, without considering the merits of this instrument and improvised statement I find it useful to clear up these unnecessary doubts, citing the teacher, Andrea Evola Julius Caesar.
Baron black, anti-serious, convinced, he wasted gallons of ink to explain to would-be comrades this exemplary truth
"The real antithesis is not 'the one between capitalism and Marxism, but that between a system in which the economy is king, who also is the form that it is relevant, and a system in which it is subject to non-economic factors in an order much larger and more complete, giving a human life a deeper meaning and enable the development of opportunities taller than her. "
But anyhow ...
Franco Cardini, in issue 18 of " the State ", lucidly writes:
E 'we must refer to the latter type and, therefore, set our common policy. We must discard as soon as possible and take the useless junk nostalgic a "new road".
Another gross mistake should definitely traced in wanting to associate fascism to the right. The only connection between fascism properly understood and the right is to be found only with nationalism. After that, the streets are divided into irreversibly. The revolutionary socialism of Sorel, the death of Bombacci along with the fascist, the nihilism of Nietzsche, the contempt of being bourgeois Drieu La Rochelle, can not in any way be associated with "bourgeois fashion" right and left!
regard, then, fascism, its origins and especially the epic of CSR, there are, in my opinion, doubt. Whatever the social background of Mussolini and the Nazi experience social and final incarnation, there are many writings of the two decades that clear indications that the choices made by Mussolini. Benito Mussolini wrote the 07/04/1926:
To date, there is, by some, the unfortunate choice to associate fascism to liberalism. I do not know if this has happened more by accident (the case does not exist) or to attract certain nostalgia for the safe shore their interests. Fascism is the negation of liberalism and individualism. Fascism is vanguard total, compared to the ideal and rotting of the epochal 1789 '48 and 1917. Fascism and National Socialism are the overcoming of historical materialism and Marxist repudiation of the whole society of "middle class welfare." This "being" Nazi-fascism opposes another Wellness: a healthy spirit legionnaire. To make a synthesis. Fascism is revolutionary in its principles, ideas, and especially in the shares. The right is preservation of bourgeois reaction, anti-popular policy in the service of capital, banks and those who have strong interests to defend. No analogy with the bourgeois pig. With no apparent reactionary monarchists. The similarities are artificial to the Masons of the conservative bloc, to the right of all, that in the current climate, they tend to divide the good from the bad fascism. This is the strategy developed and completed by all right, at the expense of comrades in good faith. To realize just read any newspaper on the right. But
we are today. The most striking representation of the macroscopic and there was in '68. Do not remember, to be short, the vicissitudes of Valle Giulia and the assault at the University of Rome decided by the MSI. In any event, we can say without fear of contradiction, that in the short span of time between these two events is born and dies, the only idea of \u200b\u200ba unified anti-bourgeois revolution. The idea
as theorized by Pierre Drieu La Rochelle died at birth, at the hands of Almirante, Caradonna and others. After this episode the power use at its discretion and consumption, the two opposite extremes in order to consolidate and maintain the "status quo". It is clear, that the expense was more precisely the neo-fascism. In fact, from that moment, you gain the field, the reputation of a violent reactionary. Not only! The university lost its representatives. Culture is already highly politicized and anti-fascist, was consolidated as a single dominant culture of the country. The left had scored another important goal Gramsci: the conquest of cultural power. The neo-fascism, conversely, was punished and relegated to the ghetto, or rather, in the "gutter".
end of the second episode.
Franco Cardini, in issue 18 of " the State ", lucidly writes:
"The answer is all contained within a misunderstanding and a paradox: 1848.
For this reason, the right is not verifiable. There are the liberal-conservative, as the Gentile, the Salvador de Madariaga, The Ortega y Gasset, the Max Weber. But this right has nothing to do with that which arises from the counter, or with what - animated by a fierce hatred against bourgeois values \u200b\u200band forgiven out dall'ottantanove - Who often end up with sympathize with utopians and revolutionaries. "
E 'we must refer to the latter type and, therefore, set our common policy. We must discard as soon as possible and take the useless junk nostalgic a "new road".
Another gross mistake should definitely traced in wanting to associate fascism to the right. The only connection between fascism properly understood and the right is to be found only with nationalism. After that, the streets are divided into irreversibly. The revolutionary socialism of Sorel, the death of Bombacci along with the fascist, the nihilism of Nietzsche, the contempt of being bourgeois Drieu La Rochelle, can not in any way be associated with "bourgeois fashion" right and left!
regard, then, fascism, its origins and especially the epic of CSR, there are, in my opinion, doubt. Whatever the social background of Mussolini and the Nazi experience social and final incarnation, there are many writings of the two decades that clear indications that the choices made by Mussolini. Benito Mussolini wrote the 07/04/1926:
"We represent a new principle, we represent the antithesis of clear, categorical, definitive worldwide democracy, plutocracy, masonry, all the world, to say a word, the immortal principles of '89 (...) "
To date, there is, by some, the unfortunate choice to associate fascism to liberalism. I do not know if this has happened more by accident (the case does not exist) or to attract certain nostalgia for the safe shore their interests. Fascism is the negation of liberalism and individualism. Fascism is vanguard total, compared to the ideal and rotting of the epochal 1789 '48 and 1917. Fascism and National Socialism are the overcoming of historical materialism and Marxist repudiation of the whole society of "middle class welfare." This "being" Nazi-fascism opposes another Wellness: a healthy spirit legionnaire. To make a synthesis. Fascism is revolutionary in its principles, ideas, and especially in the shares. The right is preservation of bourgeois reaction, anti-popular policy in the service of capital, banks and those who have strong interests to defend. No analogy with the bourgeois pig. With no apparent reactionary monarchists. The similarities are artificial to the Masons of the conservative bloc, to the right of all, that in the current climate, they tend to divide the good from the bad fascism. This is the strategy developed and completed by all right, at the expense of comrades in good faith. To realize just read any newspaper on the right. But
we are today. The most striking representation of the macroscopic and there was in '68. Do not remember, to be short, the vicissitudes of Valle Giulia and the assault at the University of Rome decided by the MSI. In any event, we can say without fear of contradiction, that in the short span of time between these two events is born and dies, the only idea of \u200b\u200ba unified anti-bourgeois revolution. The idea
as theorized by Pierre Drieu La Rochelle died at birth, at the hands of Almirante, Caradonna and others. After this episode the power use at its discretion and consumption, the two opposite extremes in order to consolidate and maintain the "status quo". It is clear, that the expense was more precisely the neo-fascism. In fact, from that moment, you gain the field, the reputation of a violent reactionary. Not only! The university lost its representatives. Culture is already highly politicized and anti-fascist, was consolidated as a single dominant culture of the country. The left had scored another important goal Gramsci: the conquest of cultural power. The neo-fascism, conversely, was punished and relegated to the ghetto, or rather, in the "gutter".
end of the second episode.
0 comments:
Post a Comment