to: Vittorio Fincati
Silvano Lorenzoni, razziologo Italian contemporary, bold and outspoken, in his World auroral continues close examination has already been done in previous writings on the theme of "epochal caesura", ie those faults or fractures psycho time-separating the different humanity have occurred on earth through the ages. The last of these ruptures to date back about 12,000 years ago, coinciding with the submersion of the great island of Atlantis, "assumption of this book is to describe the world as it could be soon after the sinking of Atlantis." Perhaps the author would have done better not to compromise with the myth of Atlantis and confined to indicating the date, because the existence and location of this geo-political entity is far from established fact. If it is true that Plato has indubitable combinations of the Iberian-Atlantic territory, rivers of ink on the subject are paid to show how improbable it was so far every attempt of localization. However, without this location
apodictic the author could not say much: in fact his own narrative based on the existence of the foundations of the Atlantic on the myth of the lost continent and other lost continents such as Mu, Lemuria, Hyperborea and Gondwana, which by its same explicit admission, derived from speculation (and in some cases by the visionary) of mostly theosophical writers, whose inconsistency Rene Guenon has a very well educated (see his The Theosophy, the story of a pseudo-religion).
Lorenzoni says openly follow the doctrine under which theosophical on earth there have been cycles of civilization, to describe them (for that purpose attach a sketch) curiously divides the globe into two hemispheres from north to south by a part of Eurasia, Africa and Oceania, the Americas, on the other, then dissects these hemispheres longitudinally in horizontal bands and "wedge intrusion" to the north, near the Arctic, there would have been the band of Hyperborea, seat of a superior race: the Indo-European or Indo-Germans. Below, that is broadly in Europe and Asian Russia, a sort of no man's land where swarmed after the Indo-Europeans; below "the intrusion due Atlantis Mediterranean Atlantic Hindustani", populated by Indo-Europeans "intruders" with inferior races scontratisi source of distant Antarctic, an "intrusion" East-Siberian part of inhabitants of the continent Mu dissolved simultaneously with Atlantis, but also part of the "super-race" origins of the northern hemisphere. Under the Atlantic and Indian band, Lorenzoni puts the "underworld band" comprised nearly the whole of Africa, Saudi, India and East Asia from the Yellow River down, "hell" because now populated by ancient races convoluted in animal, which the author is mainly blacks and other minority groups. Finally there is the Antarctic zone, which was the site of a pre-Hyperborean civilization of incredible antiquity from which swarm in the north-south across a series of convoluted and degenerate and ignoble people who are mestizos in their encounter / clash with the Indo-Europeans. "Hell" are all the ancient American peoples, although variations of the "intrusion" of race is superior to that of Atlantis Mu. The author
writes it, but obviously it requires, this assumption summarizes the theory of "reversal of the poles," which justifies all this exposure: a result of a cosmic upheaval, the Earth's axis would be reversed as an hourglass, resulting in a super-epic caesura, while the simple oscillation of the axis would lead to the glaciation of Antarctica that is of Hyperborea, causing the migration of their inhabitants.
theory as a whole, is not without its charm and there are no impediments to speculation that they can deny, however, until you find archaeological traces in the two poles that can certify that different climatic conditions, from the point of view pragmatic, we should simply accept the latest acquisitions of paleoanthropologists.
This is the fundamental system of the rate of which is then divided Lorenzoni razziologica description of the various human races, making a considerable wealth of data, many of which are highly debatable that would require an essay of this size to be addressed (a major threat to its razziologiche assessments, for example, the Egyptians, the author simply pretending to ignore) addivenenti then estimates that the human point of view are the weaker side of his entire essay.
If it is true that its ratings on the pragmatic superiority of Indo-Europeans are rebuttable only by a blind, it is equally true that the non-pragmatic superiority of peoples "hell" has been overwhelming. You can give it a superiority on two irreconcilable categories? Of course not.
Article read: 449 times (February 10, 2011)
